<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Blog of Leon Apel &#187; Daily Affairs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leonapel.com/category/daily-affairs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leonapel.com</link>
	<description>Topics of Interest to Leaders, Entrepreneurs, Investors and Marketers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:32:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>

		<copyright>&#xA9; admin</copyright>
		<itunes:author>admin</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		
		<item>
		<title>Stamina for Late Risers &gt; Early Risers?</title>
		<link>http://www.leonapel.com/2009/05/03/stamina-for-late-risers-early-risers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leonapel.com/2009/05/03/stamina-for-late-risers-early-risers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leonapel.com/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stamina for Late Risers &#62; Early Risers: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090423.wsleep0423/BNStory/Science/. However, you need to read the journal itself to verify the quality of the study&#8217;s method. They used only 30 subjects and the specific quality assurance controls weren&#8217;t stated in the article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stamina for Late Risers &gt; Early Risers: <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090423.wsleep0423/BNStory/Science/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090423.wsleep0423/BNStory/Science/</a>. However, you need to read the journal itself to verify the quality of the study&#8217;s method. They used only 30 subjects and the specific quality assurance controls weren&#8217;t stated in the article.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leonapel.com/2009/05/03/stamina-for-late-risers-early-risers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not A Fan of The Fact That &#8220;Leon Apel&#8217;s Blog&#8221; Rates #2 on Google&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.leonapel.com/2007/08/21/not-a-fan-of-the-fact-that-leon-apels-blog-rates-2-on-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leonapel.com/2007/08/21/not-a-fan-of-the-fact-that-leon-apels-blog-rates-2-on-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonapel.com/2007/08/21/not-a-fan-of-the-fact-that-leon-apels-blog-rates-2-on-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m committed to getting this blog to #1 for my own name&#8230; Yup, I&#8217;m a stubborn egomaniac like that&#8230;haha]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m committed to getting this blog to #1 for my own name&#8230; Yup, I&#8217;m a stubborn egomaniac like that&#8230;haha</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leonapel.com/2007/08/21/not-a-fan-of-the-fact-that-leon-apels-blog-rates-2-on-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Better Customer Service: Get People to Do Emails, Calls, Research and More For You&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.leonapel.com/2007/07/19/train-customer-service-agents-to-do-more-for-you-like-email-you-make-calls-and-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.leonapel.com/2007/07/19/train-customer-service-agents-to-do-more-for-you-like-email-you-make-calls-and-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leonapel.com/2007/07/19/train-customer-service-agents-to-do-more-for-you-like-email-you-make-calls-and-research/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you take full advantage of the services offered by customer service representatives or do you waste time by doing tasks that they are paid to do for you anyways? &#160; It sometimes several hours a week to receive proper customer support and implement their recommendations, hence the need to outsource (see previous post).&#160;&#160;&#160; Lately, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><font size="5"><font color="#ff0000"><strong>Do you take full advantage of the services offered by customer service representatives or do you waste time by doing tasks <u>that they are </u></strong><strong><u>paid to do for you anyways</u>?</strong></font></font></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It sometimes several hours a week to receive proper customer support and implement their recommendations, hence the need to outsource (see previous post).&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Lately, I&#8217;ve been requesting that my customer service agents to do more for me and save me time doing a lot of the grunt work they ask me to do.&nbsp; At first I tend to get some hesitation; however, it still works more often than not.</p>
<p>The following are my typical requests, which seem reasonable yet about 50% of companies offering services including PROS/CONS according to my experience:</p>
<p><font size="4">- Flexibility in Providing Support<br />
</font></p>
<p>WHO DOES IT WELL: Most web hosting companies &#8211; You can pay for support offered through multiple channels including web chat, emails, phone calls, and more.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve even given a hosting company access to my computer to help with a support issue (1&amp;1 Hosting)</p>
<p>NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: Most local businesses who are still very Web 1.0 and living in a 20th Century world.&nbsp; Please adapt!<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><font size="4">- Making internal phone calls to other divisions for me (don&#8217;t you hate getting the run-around?)<br />
</font></p>
<p>WHO DOES IT WELL: HP (Hewlett Packard)</p>
<p>NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: TD Canada Trust (They couldn&#8217;t forward a message to my local branch when asked)</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>- E</strong>mailing me information rather than wasting my time by making me write it down:</font></p>
<p>WHO DOES IT WELL: 1&amp;1 Internet Hosting &#8211; They always give me detailed descriptions and instructions upon request with 24/7 support</p>
<p>NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: 90%+ of local businesses who &quot;don&#8217;t do email&quot; and TD Canada Trust<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>- L</strong>istens/responds to my requests carefully as opposed to giving automated answers</font></p>
<p>WHO DOES IT WELL: Local businesses who do not have automated systems</p>
<p>NEEDS IMPROVEMENT: 1&amp;1 Internet Hosting &#8211; I gave specific requests and they failed to read 2+ of my emails</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>- </strong>Friendliness</font></p>
<p>I found this factor to relevant on a person-by-person basis as opposed to an organizational trend</p>
<p>There are plenty of other examples &#8230;</p>
<p>This boils down to AUTOMATED SYSTEMS VERSUS PERSONALIZED SYSTEMS.&nbsp; Obviously, there is a loss in some customer satisfaction either way:&nbsp; automated systems are relatively more consistent yet more inflexible due to standard procedures.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.leonapel.com/2007/07/19/train-customer-service-agents-to-do-more-for-you-like-email-you-make-calls-and-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
